twgs.org

Msg.ID: 26677
From: Space Ghost
About: Re: C2 Stealing Subspaces in the BG3.
At: 2004-07-13 22:02:24

such condensation from you....

ofcourse i've come to expect that from you.

Does it make you feel good to say things like that???

SG

-------Original Message-------

From: Kemper3
Date: 07/13/04 21:58:56
To: spaceghost@booinc.com
Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: C2 Stealing Subspaces in the BG3.

Considering the number of screwups I've seen from your corp so far
this game, I really don't have much trouble believing them.

On 13 Jul 2004 at 21:54, Space Ghost wrote:

>
> well thats a nice opinion
>
> just isnt my opinion...
>
> BIG GAME is really supposed to be a learning situation...
>
> i suspect that the reason they are not saying who/how is because of
> the method this was obtained wasnt very respectable.
>
> i could of course be wrong.
>
>
> SG
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Kemper3
> Date: 07/13/04 21:30:17
> To: spaceghost@booinc.com
> Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: C2 Stealing Subspaces in the BG3.
>
> There is nothing suspicous about not wanting to name names. If
> you're told who screwed up, you'll make sure he doesn't do it again.
>
>
> On 13 Jul 2004 at 21:16, Space Ghost wrote:
>
> >
> > well first and foremost THERE IS NO RULE against sub soace scanning
> >
> > NO RULE NONE,,,,,
> >
> > there WAS a gentleman's agreement between the captains about no plan et
b
> uy
> > outs no ship buy outs and no sub space scanning....
> >
> > i would think that it this agreement would apply in the situation...i w
ou
> ld
> > like to think that even if a SS was blurted teams wouldnt want to win t
ha
> t
> > way...
> >
> > That doesn't make me right....
> >
> > IF tommorow there is a planet buy out or a ship buy out,.,.,i also wo ul
dn
> t
> > be surprised BECAUSE there is no RULE against it...
> >
> > just some agreement between three captains,,,
> >
> > and its kinda obvious it doesnt mean anything to them....
> >
> > AS for OZ using a sub space scanner...who know...we can't prove it
> > one way or the other..but it is highly suspicious and neither oz nor n
az
> > want to name names as to how this happened.
> >
> >
> > o well time to move on.
> >
> >
> > SG
> >
> > SG
> >
> > -------Original Message-------
> >
> > From: prestone
> > Date: 07/13/04 16:02:15
> > To: spaceghost@booinc.com
> > Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: C2 Stealing Subspaces in the BG3.
> >
> > >From a message by WooF! about Re: C2 Stealing Subspaces in the BG3.:
> > > As for doing the math, if someone scans each subspace for 5 seconds =2E
Th
> ere
> > are what like 60,000 subspace frequencies. Well that would equal 300, 00
0
> > seconds of usage. 300,000 seconds divided by 60 =3D3D3D 5,000 minutes =2E 5,
000
> > minutes divided by 60 min (for the hour) =3D3D3D 83.3 hours. Divide t hat
answ
> er
> > between 24 hours in a day, that would relatively mean that it would b e
> > roughly 3.5 days to scan all the frequencies to break down what corp is
> > using what. Now its tuesday, considering we had low frequencies, a su bs
pa
> ce
> > scanner would have found it by now. Considering that big game 3 has s ta
rt
> ed
> > since Friday till being caught on monday.
> > >
> > > But so far its all talk, so far I havent seen a single shred of p ro
of
> to
> > our 3rd subspace # from whoever said it in the last billion posts. I wi
ll
> > shut up when I see who posted the last #. Cuz honestly you dont see w ho
> > posted it, then the obvious answer afterwards is that corp 2 used a s ub
sp
> ace
> > scanner. I mean its not so difficult for you to pull up your logs whi ch
> > everyone logs everything, and show who posted it. If we're in the wro ng
i
> ll
> > eat my words. But i doubt we're in the wrong.
> > >
> > > WooF!
> > > oh and didaskalos. Shut up! If your not on corp 2.
> >
> > if oz was using ss scanning i think he would admit to it.
> > he's broken rules before and admitted it. your team has some players s
o
> new
> > they've never used twarp before. its quite obvious to me that your te
am
> > made the blunder. what i don't care for is your teams accusations wit h
ja
> ck
> > shit as proof. you seem to think that because you are so cetain you ha
ve
> > elminated all the other possibilities, that a rule violation has occu re
d.
> > and you can of course prove this. please show us all the evidence yo u
ha
> ve
> > of his wrongdoing. didn't think so. fuck you and all those that acc us
ed
> oz
> > without any proof.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
--
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]